http://fukushima.greenaction-japan.org/
The latest article I posted there seemed like a good one to share with you all.
Just like Wall Street and other toxic industries.
Japan Ignored Nuclear Risks, Official Says
New York Times
By HIROKO TABUCHI
Published: February 15, 2012
TOKYO — In surprisingly frank public testimony on Wednesday,Japan’s nuclear safety chief said the country’s regulations were fundamentally flawed and laid out a somber picture of a nuclear industry shaped by freewheeling power companies, toothless regulators and a government more interested in promoting nuclear energy than in safeguarding the health of its citizens.
The disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, stricken by an earthquake and a tsunami last March, has led to widespread criticism of nuclear officials for their lax approach to safety, as well as for a bungled response that allowed meltdowns to occur at three of the plant’s six reactors.
The scale of the accident, which forced almost 100,000 people from their homes and contaminated a wide area of northeastern Japan, has put pressure on the government to explain why warnings about the plant’s safety went unheeded and global safety standards were ignored, even as officials promoted nuclear power as the country’s most reliable source of electricity.
Haruki Madarame, head of a panel of nuclear safety experts who provide technical advice to the government, told a Parliament-sponsored inquiry on Wednesday that Japanese officials had succumbed to a blind belief in the country’s technical prowess and failed to thoroughly assess the risks of building nuclear reactors in an earthquake-prone country.
For example, officials did not give serious consideration to what would happen if electric power were lost at a nuclear station, because they believed that Japan’s power grid was far more reliable than those in other countries, he said. The March earthquake and tsunami cut off the Fukushima plant from the grid, leaving operators unable to keep the reactor cores from overheating.
“Though global safety standards kept on improving, we wasted our time coming up with excuses for why Japan didn’t need to bother meeting them,” Mr. Madarame said.
Officials also gave too little attention, he said, to new studies raising the possibility of large earthquakes off the coast of Fukushima Prefecture. Mr. Madarame said he was to blame for some of the lapses, but that the Nuclear Safety Commission had a culture of complacency long before he took over in mid-2010.
His candid testimony comes at a time when the government is pushing to restart reactors around the country that were shut down following the accident. Only 3 of Japan’s 54 reactors are operating; the rest have been kept idle by local governments worried about safety.
To quell opposition, the central government has ordered new “stress tests” to assess whether the plants can withstand a major natural disaster. But the investigative commission’s hearings could undermine efforts to restart more reactors.
Mr. Madarame said the government should go far beyond the lax safety checks that Japanese regulators performed for years, which he said were still being carried out in some cases using “technology three decades old.” He said that regulators had been too cozy with the industry. Mr. Madarame also criticized Tokyo Electric Power, the operator of the Fukushima plant, for saying that it could not possibly have prepared for a tsunami as strong as the one last March, which killed 20,000 people along Japan’s northeast coast.
グリーンアクションの活動の一部として、
福島アップデートというホームページに
日本の原発状況関連記事をアップしています。
今日アップしたニューヨークタイムズの記事は、
原子力安全委員会の班目（まだらめ）春樹委員長が国会で言った事についてです。簡単に：
原発に関する国の安全指針が巨大な津波や全電源喪失を想定していなかったことには「指針に瑕疵（かし）があった」と謝罪。「そこまでやらなくてもいいという言い訳ばかりに時間をかけてきた。減点方式の官僚制度の限界だ」とした。
電力会社に対しても「国の指針を満たしているからと、護送船団方式で安全性を向上させる努力を怠っていた」と批判した。
この日の会合では、経済産業省原子力安全・保安院の寺坂信昭前院長からも聞き取りをした。原子力災害対策本部などの議事録が作成されていなかった問題で、同本部事務局長だった寺坂氏は「大変申し訳ない」と話した。
世界中の企業や政府の方針
命より金
消費文化のモットーみたいですね
So glad to have found this site. Do you suppose it could be estimated at what level of radiation the health benefits of permaculture give way to disease and death, such that you're back at the pre-Fukushima status quo level? There are many disease-causing agents and lifestyles besides living with radiation, and I just wondered if all the others were eliminated, or brought close to zero, how that would inversely compare with the effects of low-level radiation. If people could have some sense of how much their own actions could counter the nightmare of Fukushima, they might be motivated to live in a way that is healthier for them and their planet.
ReplyDeleteHey Tim, thats an interesting thought. You are right that for most there are other elements in life that probably have more adverse impacts on their health than radiation. The thing about radiation is its hard to understand and you can't see it. I think the challenge is that this is just another unpleasant element in an already deteriorating world. But its exciting to see the growing change in consciousness since Fukushima in Japan. Still don't have a clear idea how to apply permaculture to the Fukushima situation. I believe nukes are called a Type 1 error.
ReplyDelete